Syllabus: GS3/Environment
Context:
The recent declaration by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), permitting companies to utilize carbon offsets to fulfill their climate commitments, has generated significant criticism.
About:-
- SBTi is a collaborative effort between CDP, World Resources Institute (WRI), WWF, and the UN Global Compact.
- It drives ambitious climate action in the private sector by guiding companies in setting science-based emissions reduction targets aligned with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
- Companies can submit their targets for validation by SBTi, ensuring they are credible and contribute meaningfully to climate goals.
Recent Controversy: Carbon Offsets
- SBTi recently announced that companies could potentially use carbon offsets to achieve their Scope 3 emissions reductions. Scope 3 refers to indirect emissions from a company’s value chain, such as those from suppliers and customers.
- This decision has been met with criticism from some environmental groups. Their concerns include:
- Lack of effectiveness: Critics argue that many carbon offset projects may not deliver real, measurable, and additional emission reductions.
- Double counting: There’s a risk of companies and project developers claiming the same emission reductions.
- Focus on offsets, not reduction: Companies might prioritize offsets over actual emission reductions within their operations.
Arguments for SBTi’s Approach:
- Incentivize action: SBTi argues allowing offsets can incentivize companies to take on ambitious targets and participate in the program.
- Complement reduction efforts: Offsets can be used alongside deep internal emission reductions, especially for harder-to-abate Scope 3 emissions.
- Drive innovation: The increased demand for high-quality offsets could spur development of more rigorous and effective carbon offset projects.
Current Status:
- SBTi is still developing its rules and safeguards for using carbon offsets. They are planning to release a draft framework by July 2024.
No Comments